Phylogeny of Plectosphaerella melonis strain 502 and varietal sensitivity of cucumber plants
Abstract
Aim. To investigate the phylogenetic relations of P. melonis strain 502 and to study the varietal sensitivity of cu- cumber plants to P. melonis strain 502. Methods. DNA was extracted using the enzymatic lysis buffer. The PCR was conducted following White et al. protocol (1990). The obtained PCR-products were determined by sequencing on the automatic capillary sequencer Applied Biosystems ABI Prism 3130. The sequence of the gene 5.8S rRNA of P. melonis strain 502 was compared to the sequences from the GenBank database using the BLAST analysis. The phy- logenetic analysis was conducted by the neighbor-joining method. The evolutionary distances were estimated by the method of Jukes & Cantor. The evolutionary analysis was conducted in MEGA7. The sensitivity of cucumber plants was determined during a vegetative experiment with artificial infection background (AIB), created by introducing the infectious material of fungus P. melonis strain 502 into the soil. The infectious material was introduced at a rate of 50 thousand CFU/per 1 g of soil. The damage to the root system was assessed after 14 days of cultivating plants on the AIB. The disease severity index (DSI) was estimated to determine the general sensitivity of the investigated varieties. The varieties, which received DSI <2.0, were considered highly resistant, from 2.0 to 2.9 – moderately resistant, from 3.0 to 3.9 – susceptible, and 4.0 or higher – very susceptible. The statistical methods and Statistica 12 (Stat-Soft Inc., USA) were used to assess the reliability of the experimental data. The arithmetic mean and the square deviation (SD) were calculated to assess the DSI at p < 0.05. Results. The PCR method was used to obtain a sequence of P. melonis strain 502 of 317 bp and to conduct the phylogenetic analysis. The search of BLASTn in GenBank showed that the sequence of ITS P. melonis strain 502 had 99 % homology to 10 isolates of P. melonis. California isolate CA-1103 differed from P. melonis strain 502 only by one pair of nucleotides. The homology percentage was also 99 % to the iso- lates from Texas (TX-1060 and TX-1065), Japan (CBS 489.96 and АССС:39138), and Italy (Plect 211 and Plect 212). Spanish isolates (А-943, А-537, А-99) had a smaller percentage of homology ‒ 98 %. The distribution of the disease for varieties Zhuravlionok, Konkurent, and Rodnichok was 50 %, and for varieties Nizhynsky 12 and Liosha – 60 and 80 %, respectively. The study on the varietal sensitivity to P. melonis strain 502 demonstrated that varieties Konkurent (DSI ‒ 1.3 ± 0.0) and Rodnichok (DSI ‒ 1.5 ± 0.1) were referred to the group of highly resistant ones, Zhuravlionok (DSI ‒ 2.6 ± 0.3), Liosha (DSI ‒ 2.2 ± 0.2) and Nizhynskyi 12 (DSI ‒ 2.5 ± 0.2) – moderately resistant. The root collar was most severely diseased; it was of brown color. There were no above-ground symptoms. Additional roots above the damaged area were observed in cucumber plants of Zhuravlionok, Konkurent, and Rodnichok. Conclusions. The phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that P. melonis strain 502 had 99 % homology with 10 isolates of P. melonis from the USA, Japan, and Italy. The percentage of homology with Spanish isolates, first isolated as the representatives of this genus, was lower (98 %). The root collar was damaged the most, which also indicated the similarity of symptoms to the American isolates compared to the ones from Spain, where the hypocotyl was damaged. There were no above- ground disease symptoms. The distribution of the disease and the degree of the damage were different depending on the variety. They did not depend on the maturity group, which demonstrated individual varietal sensitivity and the relevance of selecting resistant varieties as one of the main ways to control this disease agent. The study of the varietal sensitivity of C. sativus to P. melonis strain 502 showed that varieties Konkurent and Rodnichok could be referred to the highly resistant group, while Zhuravlionok, Liosha, and Nizhynskyi 12 – to moderately resistant ones. The distri- bution of the disease was also different depending on the variety (Zhuravlionok, Konkurent, and Rodnichok – 50 %, Nizhynsky 12 and Liosha – 60 and 80 %, respectively). Additional roots above the damaged area were observed in cucumber plants of varieties Zhuravlionok, Konkurent, and Rodnichok as a defensive response to being infected by the pathogen. No response of oversensitivity was registered in the investigated varieties of cucumber plants regard- ing P. melonis strain 502, which was conditioned by the stability of the environmental factors and absence of abiotic stressors for the plant, including moisture shortage and high temperatures.References
Abad P, Perez A, Marques MC, Vicente MJ, Bruton BD, Garcia-Jimenez J (2000) Assessment of vegetative compatibility of Acremonium cucurbitacearum and Plectosphaerella cucumerina isolates from diseased melon plants. OEPP/EPPO Bulletin 30:199–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2338.2000.tb00879.x
Aegerter BJ, Gordon TR, Davis RM (2000) Occurrence and pathogenicity of fungi associated with melon root rot and vine decline in California. Plant Dis 84(3):224–230. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2000.84.3.224
Alfaro-Fernandez A, Garcia-Luis A (2009) Colonisation and histological changes in muskmelon and autumn squash tissues infected by Acremonium cucurbitacearum or Monosporascus cannonballus. Eur J Plant Pathol 125(1):73–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-009-9460-0
Alfaro-Garcia A, Armengol J, Bruton BD, Gams W, Garcia-Jimenez J, Martinez-Ferrer G (1996) The taxonomic position of the causal agent of Acremonium collapse. Mycologia 88:804–808. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1996.12026718
Armengol J, Sanz E, Martinez-Ferrer G, Sales R, Bruton BD, Garcia-Jimenez J (1998) Host range of Acremonium cucurbitacearum, cause of Acremonium collapse of muskmelon. Plant Pathol 47:29–35. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3059.1998.00199.x
Baalen M van, Jansen VAA (2001) Dangerous liaisons: the ecology of private interest and common good. Oikos 95:211–224
Biernaki M, Bruton BD (2001) Quantitative response of Cucumis melo inoculated with root rot pathogens. Plant Dis 85:65–70. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2001.85.1.65
Bronstein JL (2001) The Costs of Mutualism. Am Zool 41:825–839
Bruton BD, Davis RM, Gordon TR (1995) Occurrence of Acremonium sp. and Monosporascus cannonballus in the major cantaloupe and watermelon growing areas of California. Plant Dis 79:754. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2000.84.3.224
Bruton BD, Garcia-Jimenez J, Armengol J, Popham TW (2000a) Assessment of virulence of Acremonium cucurbitacearum and Monosporascus cannonballus on Cucumis melo. Plant Dis 84:907–913. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2000.84.8.907
Bruton BD, Garcia-Jimenez J, Armengol J (1999) Analysis of the relationship between temperature and vine declines caused by Acremonium cucurbitacearum and Monosporascus cannonballus. Subtropical Plant Sci 51:23–28
Bruton BD, Miller ME, Garcia-Jimenez J (1996) Comparison of Acremonium sp. from the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas with Acremonium sp. from Spain. Phytopathol 3:86
Bruton BD, Popham TW, Garcia-Jimenez J, Armengol J, Miller ME (2000b) Disease reaction among selected Cucurbitaceae to an Acremonium cucurbitacearum isolate from Texas. Hortscience 35(4):677–680. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.35.4.677
Carlucci A, Raimondo ML, Santos J, Phillips AJL (2012) Plectosphaerella species associated with root and collar rots of horticultural crops in southern Italy. Pers.: Mol Phylogeny Evol Fungi 28(1):34–48. https://doi.org/10.3767/003158512x638251
Chilosi G, Reda R, Aleandri MP, Camele I, Altieri L et al (2008) Fungi associated with root rot and collapse of melon in Italy. OEPP/EPPO Bulletin 38:147–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2338.2008.01200.x
Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791
Garcia-Jimenez J, Velazquez MT, Jorda C, Alfaro-Garcia A (1994) Acremonium species as the causal agent of muskmelon collapse in Spain. Plant Dis 78:416–419. https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-78-0416
Gubler WD, Zitter NA, Hopkins DL, Thomas CE (1996) Acremonium hypocotyl rot. In: Zitter TA, Hopkins DL, Thomas CE. (eds) Compendium of Cucurbit Diseases, American Phytopathological Society, St Paul, MN, 9 p
Iglesias A, Pico B, Nuez F (1999) Resistance to melon dieback in C. melo ssp. agrestis Pat 81. Phytopathol 89:35
Iglesias A, Pico B, Nuez F (2000) Pathogenicity of fungi associated with melon vine decline and selection strategies for breeding resistant cultivars. Ann Appl Biol 137:141–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2000.tb00046.x
Jukes TH, Cantor CR (1969) Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro HN. (ed) Mammalian Protein Metabolism, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 21–132 p
Kogel KH, Franken P, Huckelhoven R (2006) Endophyte or parasite – what decides? Curr Opin Plant Biol 9:358–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2006.05.001
Kopilov E, Tsekhmister H, Nadkernychna O, Kyslynska A (2021) Identification of Plectosphaerella melonis from cucumber plants in Ukraine. Phytopathol Mediterr 60(2):259–263. https://doi.org/10.36253/phyto-12612
Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evolut 33:1870–1874. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054
Martinez-Culebras PV, Abad-Campos P, Garcia-Jimenez J (2004) Molecular characterization and PCR detection of the melon pathogen Acremonium cucurbitacearum. Eur J Plant Pathol 110:801–809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-004-2490-8
Patyka V, Tsekhmister H, Kopylov Y, Kyslynska A, Kalinichenko A, Sporek M, Stebila J (2022) Histological change in cucumber tissue and cellulase activity of Plectosphaerella melonis strain. Appl Sci 12(10):5085. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12105085
Raimondo ML, Carlucci A (2018a) Characterization and pathogenicity of Plectosphaerella spp. collected from basil and parsley in Italy. Phytopathol Mediterr 57(2):284–295. https://doi.org/10.14601/phytopathol_mediterr23206
Raimondo ML, Carlucci A (2018b) Characterization and pathogenicity assessment of Plectosphaerella species associated with stunting disease on tomato and pepper crops in Italy. Plant Pathol 67(3):626–641. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12766
Redman RS, Dunigan D, Rodriguez RJ (2001) Fungal symbiosis from mutualism to parasitism: who controls the outcome, host or invader? New Phytol 151(3):705–716. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0028-646x.2001.00210.x
Saikkonen K, Wali P, Helander M, Faeth SH (2004) Evolution of endophyte-plant symbioses. Trends Plant Sci 9:275–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2004.04.005
Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evolut 4:406–425
Selim KA, El-Beih AA, AbdEl-Rahman TM, El-Diwany AI (2012) Biology of Endophytic Fungi. Curr Res Environ Appl Mycol J Fungal Biol 2(1):31–82. https://doi.org/10.5943/cream/2/1/3
Tkachik SO (2014) Methodology of phytopathological treatment for piece infected plant. TOV Nilaen-LTD, Kyiv, Ukraine, 76 p. (in Ukrainian)
Tsekhmister H, Kyslynska A, Kopilov E, Nadkernychna O (2021) Plant growth regulatory activity in the phytopathogenic fungus Plectosphaerella melonis strain 502. Agric Sci Pract 8(3):13–24. https://doi.org/10.15407/agrisp8.03.013
White TJ, Bruns TD, Lee SB, Taylor JW (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications, Academic Press, New York, USA, 315–321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.


