Resistance of genetically modified wheat plants, containing a double-stranded RNA suppressor of the

O. V. Dubrovna; O. O. Stasik; G. O. Priadkina; O. V. Zborivska; O. G. Sokolovska-Sergiienko

doi:10.15407/agrisp7.02.024

O. V. Dubrovna Institute of Plant Physiology and Genetics, NAS of Ukraine 31/17, Vasylkivska Str., Kyiv, Ukraine, 03022
O. O. Stasik Institute of Plant Physiology and Genetics, NAS of Ukraine 31/17, Vasylkivska Str., Kyiv, Ukraine, 03022
G. O. Priadkina Institute of Plant Physiology and Genetics, NAS of Ukraine 31/17, Vasylkivska Str., Kyiv, Ukraine, 03022
O. V. Zborivska Institute of Plant Physiology and Genetics, NAS of Ukraine 31/17, Vasylkivska Str., Kyiv, Ukraine, 03022
O. G. Sokolovska-Sergiienko Institute of Plant Physiology and Genetics, NAS of Ukraine 31/17, Vasylkivska Str., Kyiv, Ukraine, 03022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/agrisp7.02.024

Keywords: transgenic wheat, soil drought, proline, antioxidant enzymes (SOD, APX), grain yield

Abstract

Aim. Analysis of physiological and biochemical characteristics and grain productivity traits of transgenic common wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.) with a double-stranded RNA suppressor of the proline dehydrogenase gene (pdh) compared to non-transgenic genotypes under conditions of soil drought. Methods. Biochemical assays: spectrophotometric measurements of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, APX) activity, proline dehydrogenase activity and free L-proline content; biotechnological assays: Agrobacterium-mediated transformation in planta; physiological: morphometric traits and elements of grain productivity; mathematical statistics. Results. The presence of a double-stranded RNA suppressor of the gene pdh in transgenic plants leads not only to a decrease in enzyme activity (on average 2 times compared to the nontransgenic plants), but also to an increase in the content of free L-proline both under optimal conditions and under soil drought (2.6–4.1 times). Under soil moisture defi ciency, transgenic plants with reduced pdh gene activity in terms of yield structure signifi cantly exceeded the corresponding values of grain productivity elements for the non-transformed ones. In terms of the grain weight from the main stem, the biotechnological plants under soil moisture defi ciency exceeded the control plants 1.5–1.6 times, while the number of grains did not differ signifi cantly. The grain productivity of the whole plant in the transformed lines under conditions of soil moisture defi ciency was somewhat inferior to those in the nontransformed plants grown under optimal conditions. Soil drought caused a signifi cant increase in SOD and APX activity (by 40 and 11 %, respectively) in plants of the original variety. On the contrary, the activity of both antioxidant enzymes under drought conditions in transgenic plants decreased: SOD – down to 73–76 %, APX – down to 82–86 %, compared with the variant of 70 % of fi eld capacity. Conclusions. The analysis of physiological and biochemical characteristics, as well as economic and grain productivity elements of transgenic common wheat plants with a double-stranded RNA suppressor of the proline dehydrogenase gene showed their increased tolerance to soil drought, compared with non-transgenic genotypes, which may be associated with higher proline accumulation and an increase in the antioxidant enzymes activity. Under soil moisture defi ciency, transgenic wheat plants with reduced pdh gene activity signifi cantly exceeded the corresponding values of grain productivity elements for non-transformed plants. The analysis of the antioxidant enzymes activity in the chloroplasts of transgenic plants showed that under physiological conditions, the antioxidant system works more actively in comparison with non-transgenic genotypes, which may be a prerequisite for increasing the tolerance of these plants to the infl uence of stressors of various origin. It is likely that the positive relationship between the level of free L-proline and the resistance of transgenic wheat plants to osmotic stress is associated either with the effect of L-proline on the expression of other genes of the stress-strain response of plants, or with the positive effect of the increased content of this amino acid on resistance at the early stages of stress development. It has been suggested that an increase in the antioxidant enzymes activity in biotechnological plants can be caused by the expression of heterologous genes.

References

Abid M, Ali S, Qi LK et al. (2018) Physiological and biochemical changes during drought and recovery periods at tillering and jointing stages in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Sci. Rep. 8:4615. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21441-7.

Agarwal S, Grover A. (2006) Molecular biology, biotechnology and genomics of flooding-associated low O2 stress response in plants. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 25:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680500365232.

Ahmed M, ul-Hassan F, Qadir G et al. (2017) Response of proline accumulation in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under rainfed conditions. J. Agric. Meteorol. 73:147–55. https://doi.org/10.2480/agrmet.D-14-00047.

Amoah JN, Ko CS, Yoon JS et al. (2019) Effect of drought acclimation on oxidative stress and transcript expression in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J. Plant Interact. 14:492–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2019.1662098.

Anjum SA, Ashraf U, Tanveer M et al. (2017) Drought induced changes in growth, osmolyte accumulation and antioxidant metabolism of three maize hybrids. Front Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00069.

Arnon DI. (1949) Copper enzyme in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol. 24:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.24.1.1.

Ayliffe MA, Mitchell HJ, Deuschle K et al. (2005) Comparative analysis in cereals of a key proline catabolism gene. Mol. Gen. Genomics. 274:494–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-005-0048-x.

Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID. (1973) Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil. 39:205–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00018060.

Beyer WF, Fridovich I. (1987) Assaying for superoxide dismutase activity some large consequences of minor changes in conditions. Anal. Biochem. 161:559–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(87)90489-1.

Chaves MM, Flexas J, Pinheiro C. (2008) Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: Regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Ann. Bot. 103:551–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcn125.

Chen G-X, Asada K. (1989) Ascorbate peroxidase in tea leaves: occurrence of two isozymes and the differences in their enzymatic and molecular properties. Plant Cell Physiol. 30:987–98. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a077844.

Chen M, Chen J, Fang J. et al. (2014) Down-regulation of S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase genes results in reduced plant length, pollen viability, and abiotic stress tolerance. Plant Cell Tiss Organ. Cult. 116:311–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-013-0405-0.

Hiei Y, Ishida Y, Komari T. (2014) Progress of cereal transformation technology mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Front Plant Sci. 5:1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00628.

Ibragimova SS, Kolodyazhnaya YS, Gerasimova SV. et al. (2012) Partial suppression of gene encoding proline dehydrogenase enhances plant tolerance to various abiotic stresses. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 59:88–96. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443712010086.

Khan MS, Ahmad D, Khan MA. (2015) Utilization of genes encoding osmoprotectants in transgenic plants for enhanced stress tolerance. Electron. J. Biotechn. 18:257–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbt.2015.04.002.

Khanna-Chopra R, Selote DS. (2007) Acclimation to drought stress generates oxidative stress tolerance in drought-resistant than -susceptible wheat cultivar under field conditions. Environ. Exp. Bot. 60:276–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2006.11.004.

Kolupayev YuE, Karpets YuV, Kabashnikova LF. (2019) Antioxidative System of Plants: Cellular Compartmentalization, Protective and Signaling Functions, Mechanisms of Regulation (Review). Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 55:419–40. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0003683819050089.

Laxa M, Liebthal M, Telman W. et al. (2019) The role of the plant antioxidant system in drought tolerance. Antioxidants. 8:94. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox8040094.

Mahajan S, Tuteja N. (2005) Cold, salinity and drought stresses: An overview. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 444:139–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2005.10.018.

Manavalan LP, Chen X, Clarke J et al. (2012) RNAi-mediated disruption squalen synthase improves drought tolerance and yield in rise. J. Exp. Bot. 63:163–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/err258.

Mansour MMF, Ali EF. (2017) Evaluation of proline functions in saline conditions. Phytochemistry. 140:52–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2017.04.016.

Maralian H, Ebadi A, Didar TR et al. (2010) Influence of water deficit stress on wheat grain yield and proline accumulation rate. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 5:286–9. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR09.483.

Mattioni C, Lacerenza NG, Troccoli AD et al. (1997) Water and salt stress-induced alterations in proline metabolism of Triticum durum seedlings. Physiol. Plant. 101:787–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1997.tb01064.x.

Morgun VV, Dubrovna OV, Morgun BV. (2016) The modern biotechnologies of producing wheat plants resistant to stresses. Fiziol. Rast. Genet. 48:196–213. https://doi.org/10.15407/frg2016.03.196.

Nowsherwan I, Shabbir G, Malik SI et al. (2018) Effect of drought stress on different physiological traits in bread wheat. SAARS J. Agric. 16:1–6. https://doi.org/10.3329/sja.v16i1.37418.

Nyachiro JM, Briggs KG, Hoddinott J. et al. (2001) Chlorophyll content, chlorophyll fluorescence and water deficit in spring wheat. Cereal. Res. Comm. 29:135–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03543653.

Qaseem MF, Qureshi R, Shaheen H. (2019) Effects of pre-anthesis drought, heat and their combination on the growth, yield and physiology of diverse wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes varying in sensitivity to heat and drought stress. Sci. Rep. 9:6955. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43477-z.

Hassanuzzaman M, Fujita M, Oku H., Islam MT. (2019) Plant tolerance to environmental stress. Role of photoprotectants, CRC Press, 468 p. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203705315.

Sarker U, Shinya O. (2018) Catalase, superoxide dismutase and ascorbate-glutathione cycle enzymes confer drought tolerance of Amaranthus tricolor. Sci. Rep. 8:6496. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34944-0.

Shewry PR. Wheat. (2009) J. Exp. Bot. 60:1537–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp058.

Szabados L, Savouré A. (2009) Proline: a multifunctional amino acid. Trends Plant Sci. 15:89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2009.11.009.

Tishchenko OM, Komisarenko AG, Mykhalska SI. et al. (2014) Agrobacterium-mediated sunflower transformation (Helianthus annuus L.) in vitro and in planta using strain of LBA4404 harboring binary vector pBi2E with dsRNA-suppressor proline dehydrogenase gene. Cytol. Genet. 48(4):19–30. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0095452714040094.

Tishchenko OM, Mykhalska SI, Morgun BV. (2016) Genetic engineering and cell selection for enhancing of crop osmotolerance. Plant Physiol. Genet. 48(3):257–66. https://doi.org/10.15407/frg2016.03.257.

Verdoy D, Coba de la Peña T, Redondo FJ et al. (2006) Transgenic Medicago truncatula plants that accumulate proline display nitrogen-fixing activity with enhanced tolerance to osmotic stress. Plant Cell Environ. 29:1913–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01567.x.

Voronova SS, Bavol AV, Dubrovna OV. (2015) In planta genetic transformation of bread wheat, using AGLO strain, containing pBi2E with dsRNA suppressor of proDH gene). Fact. Experim. Evol. Organ. 17:126–30.

Wan X, Tan J, Lu S. (2009) Increased tolerance to oxidative stress in transgenic tobacco expressing a wheat oxalate oxidase gene via induction of antioxidant enzymes is mediated by H2O2. Physiol. Plant. 136:30–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2009.01210.x.

Zhang Y, Yang J, Lu S. et al. (2008) Over-expressing SgNCED1 in tobacco increases ABA level, antioxidant enzyme activities and stress tolerance. J. Plant Growth Regul. 27:151–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-008-9041-z.