online ISSN:2312-3389 print ISSN:2312-3370 DOI:10.15407/agrisp


Archive of Agricultural Science and Practice Journal issues

List of all issues / Content of issue 2019-1 / Abstract & References of Article 7
V. G. Pelikh, S. V. Ushakova, N. L. Pelikh

State Higher Educational Institution “Kherson State Agrarian University”, 23, Stritenska Str., Kherson, 73006, Ukraine


Received January 11, 2019 / Received February 10, 2019 / Accepted March 22 , 2019
Aim. To determine genetically and mathematically grounded target standards of selecting pigs for future gen- erations. To determine minimal selection limits for pigs to obtain high productivity traits. Methods. Common methods of evaluating the reproductive ability of sows, fattening and meat-fat qualities of progeny. Selection indexes were built by the method of standardized deviations according to M.V. Mykhailov. The target selec- tion limits for animals were determined using the table of Le Roy. Results. Selective-genetic parameters were determined by the main traits of reproductive ability, fattening and meat productivity of pigs. Selection indexes were estimated using the weighting coeffi cients of the traits for each group of pigs, used as a basis for minimal limits at different intensities of selection. The estimation of local progeny by selection indexes allowed ranging them depending on the level of productivity with the consideration of genotype. At 20 % selection, the minimal value of the reproductive ability index for the control group was 238.7 points. The minimal target threshold while selecting sires by the fattening traits of progeny within the 20 % selection was from 50.57 to 255.65 points for different groups. The minimal value of the index of fattening and meat traits was in the range from 270.05 to 606.94 points. Conclusions. The index estimation of pigs during the crossing allowed ranging them by the values of indexes. Minimal limits of selecting animals were determined and the selection of parental pairs with estimated productivity was optimized: in case of 20 % selection by multiple pregnancy with at least 11 animals, the area of “loin eye” – 30.5 – 44.5 It would be reasonable to select the animals, the pro- ductivity of progeny of which is above the determined limit, for further breeding from 238.70 to 606.94 points.
Key words: selection limits, Pietrain, Duroc, selection index of reproductive ability, selection index of fatten- ing traits, multibreed crossing, meat productivity.

1. Krupa E, Žáková E, Krupová Z. Evaluation of Inbreeding and Genetic Variability of Five Pig Breeds in Czech Republic. Asian-Australasian J. Anim. Sci. (AJAS). 2015;28(1):25-36. 2. Abell CE, Fernando RL, Serenius TV, Rothschild MF, Gray KA, Stalder KJ. Genetic relationship between purebred and crossbred sow longevity. J. Anim. Sci. Biotech. 2016;7:51.
3. Alfonso L. Impact of incorporating greenhouse gas intensities in selection indexes for sow productivity traits. Livestock sci. 2019;219:57-61.
4. Ali BM, Bastiaansen JWM, de Mey Y, Lansink AGJMO. Response to a selection index including environmental costs and risk references of producers. J. Anim. Sci. 2019;97(1):156-71.
5. Cheng J, Newcom DW, Schutz MM , Cui Q, Li B, Zhang H, Schinckel AP. Evaluation of current United States swine selection indexes and indexes designed for Chinese pork production. Prof. Anim. Sci. 2018;34(5):474-87.
6. Getya A, Dodenhoff J. Use of BLUP-method for selection merit evaluation in Ukrainian pig production. Zb. nauk. prats Bilotserk. derzh. agrar. un-t, 2010;3(72):52-4.
7. Nielsen SS, Denwood MJ, Forkman B, Houe H. Selection of Meat Inspection Data for an Animal Welfare Index in Cattle and Pigs in Denmark. 2017;7(12):E94.
8. Stas NM, Ellis M, Grohmann NS, Schwab CR, Shull CM, Ewing K. 030 Effect of swine sire line and selection index category on wean-to-fi nish growth performance and carcass characteristics. J. Anim. Sci. 2017:95(2):14.
9. Sánchez JP, Ragab M, Quintanilla R, Rothschild MF, Piles M. Genetic parameters and expected responses to selection for components of feed effi ciency in a Duroc pig line. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2017;49:86.
10. Song H, Zhang J, Jiang Y, Gao H, Tang S, Mi S, Yu F, Meng Q, Xiao W, Zhang Q, Ding X. Genomic prediction for growth and reproduction traits in pig using an admixed reference population. J. Anim. Sci. 2017;95(8):3415.
11. Littmann E. Schweinezucht und Schweineproduktion: Unterrichts-und Beratungshilfe. LfL, 2006.
12. Welsh CS, Stewart TS, Schwab C, Blackburn HD. Pedigree analysis of 5 swine breeds in the United States and the implications for genetic conservation. J. Anim. Sci. 2010;88(5):1610-8.
13. Mathur P, Vogelzang R, Mulder H, Knol E. Genetic selection to enhance animal welfare using meat inspection data from slaughter plants. Animals. 2018;8(2):16.
14. Suslina EN. A new breed of Duroc swine, Kirovsky, was created. Perspektivnoe svinovodstvo: Teoria i praktika. 2011;(3):12. [in Russian].
15. Svinarev IY, Goncharov AYu. Analysis of reproductive qualities of purebred Landrace breed sows and hybrids F1 (Yorkshire × Landrace). Politematicheskiy setevoy elektronnyi nauch. zhurn. Kuban. Gos. Agrar. un-ta. 2011;(70):688-97.
16. Pat. BY 17677 Republic of Belarus, MPK A 01K 67/02 (2006.01). Method of evaluating the compatibility of parental pairs of swine by meat-fattening traits of progeny. I.P. Sheiko, N.A. Loban, O.Ya. Vasyliuk, I.S. Malikov; applicant and patent holder: Republican unitary enterprise "Scientifi c-practical center of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus on animal breeding". No. a.s. 20100713; appl. 11.05.10; publ. 30.10.13.
17. Mikhailov NV, Kosteilev EV, Svinarev IY, Tretiakova OL. Application of software in selection of animals. Politematicheskiy setevoy elektronnyiy nauch zhurn. Kuban. Gos. Agrar. un-ta. 2013;(85):1-14.